A Knot of Pipeline Projects/Proposals: The Caspian Conundrum

Via Radio Free Europe, an insightful look at the multitude of Caspian pipeline projects that leaders of the Caspian Sea littoral states — Azerbaijan, Russia, Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan, and Iran — and others such as the EU and U.S. are discussing, debating, funding, and developing. As the article notes:

“…we are in the middle of a geopolitical competition for the control of Caspian natural gas,” according to analyst Federico Bordonaro of the Milan-based equilibri.net, an organization that provides conflict and energy analysis.

Russian gas giant Gazprom is among the major parties competing for resources in the Caspian Sea region, which the Russian company dominated in the 1990s. But rivals to Gazprom have appeared recently, prompting Gazprom CEO Aleksei Miller on June 2 to visit Azerbaijan — a country that does not sell any natural gas to Gazprom — and offer Baku “European prices” for its natural gas.

Miller added that Gazprom is willing to purchase all of Azerbaijan’s gas, which would then be exported via Gazprom pipelines to Europe — a situation that Brussels wants to avoid at any cost. That makes the European Union the main competitor to Gazprom in Azerbaijan.

…Azerbaijan has not yet agreed to the Gazprom proposal, and Azerbaijani officials are aware that Gazprom made a similar deal with Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan earlier this year, offering to pay “European prices” starting in 2009. Some media outlets estimated that European prices would amount to more than $300 per 1,000 cubic meters in 2009, but several weeks after signing the contract, Gazprom told Uzbekistan the price would be some $210 in 2009.

…Rovnag Abdullayev, the head of the State Oil Company of the Azerbaijan Republic (SOCAR), has indicated that he is talking with many different parties about exporting Azerbaijani gas.

“It’s not only Russia. Iran, Turkey, Israel, and European countries have expressed their willingness to buy Azerbaijani gas,” Abdullayev said. “We are looking for the most commercially profitable proposals and the best ways to launch the sale of gas from Phase 2 of the Shah Deniz [Caspian] field. Now we are analyzing [various offers] and talks with all parties continue. We will try to sell it for the best price possible.”

Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev, for his part, has said multiple export routes would be beneficial for the international community. “The issue of energy security will remain on the world’s agenda,” Aliyev said. “We feel the concerns of other countries regarding energy security…. We are ready to contribute to ensuring the energy security of these countries within acceptable terms.”

…The EU is working on its own export route for natural gas from the Caspian, the Nabucco pipeline project, which runs from Azerbaijan through the Caucasus to Turkey and on through Southeastern Europe to Austria.

Azerbaijani officials see Nabucco as helping to balance Gazprom’s influence over Caspian natural gas. SOCAR Vice President Khoshbakht Yusifzade says the Nabucco pipeline will allow Azerbaijan to leverage higher prices from partners seeking to buy gas. “When Nabucco starts operating we will tell other partners, you were buying gas for this price, but now [the situation] is different,” he says. “This all will be dictated by the economic situation.”

…But Bordonaro points out that leaving Gazprom in control of Caspian gas raises an even more unpleasant prospect. “If Russia controls the natural gas of Kazakhstan and Turkmenistan, what could also happen in the next decade is that Russia would decide to sell this gas to China instead of the European Union, which could be very dangerous for European energy security,” he says.

One advantage Gazprom has over the EU project is that it is a single entity. EU Ambassador Waddams explains that when it is time for European countries to decide who will participate in the Nabucco pipeline, conflicts may emerge. “There are a lot of gas companies — transporters, producers, and buyers,” Waddams says. “I don’t think you’ll get from the European Union, as such, an alternative offer in such a sort of simple way…. You have to see how the oil and gas companies themselves respond to this particular situation.”

…The United States supports Nabucco as a means of avoiding Russian participation in the European gas-supply chain, and has backed the participation of Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, and especially Turkmenistan in the project. Bordonaro says that ultimately the competition for Caspian gas is a battle for the gas on the eastern side of the Caspian Sea, from Kazakhstan and Turkmenistan.

Brussels and Washington are supporting the construction of a trans-Caspian, natural-gas pipeline to run from either Kazakhstan, or more likely from Turkmenistan, along the seabed to Azerbaijan, where the gas would be pumped into pipelines leading to Nabucco.

On June 3, U.S. Deputy Assistant Secretary of State Matthew Bryza told RFE/RL’s Azerbaijani Service that while the United States backs a larger effort, including the possible export of Iraqi gas through Nabucco, it does not back the inclusion of Iran in the pipeline plans. “We support Nabucco as a route to diversify shipments of gas to Europe. Concerning Iran, our policy is clear,” he said.

…An arguably easier route from the east Caspian would be through Iran but, as Bryza said, that is not an option for the United States. Washington’s foreign policy specifically precludes business deals with Iran, so the United States would prefer to keep both Russia and Iran out of the equation.

But the EU is the party seeking the gas and European relations with Iran are different than the antagonistic situation that exists between Tehran and Washington.

EU Ambassador Waddams denies the EU was talking directly to Iran about participating in Nabucco, but he does note the potential of Tehran joining the project.

“There are no specific talks, but…when the Nabucco organization talks with Iran, they are talking about possible supplies [of natural gas], not only Iranian supplies but also [Turkmen] supplies being routed through Iran,” Waddams says. “But the Iran option is not that easy either, because Iran doesn’t actually have much gas in the northern part of the country, at this stage, available for Nabucco…although it has vast quantities of gas in the south of the country. I think as a potential medium-term supplier of gas, Iran is undoubtedly a country with enormous potential for the European market.”

Mihai Bayer, Hungary’s special representative for Nabucco, says, “the international consortium hopes that Iranian gas will become accessible sooner or later and Iran will become a key source of natural gas.”

On June 4-5, Iranian Deputy Foreign Minister Alirza Sheyh told RFE/RL’s Azerbaijani Service during a visit to Azerbaijan that his country has received signs from Europe indicating possible Iranian participation in Nabucco. “European countries showed their interest in involving Iranian gas in this project. We took it into consideration and this issue is in the discussion stage,” Sheyh said….”

This entry was posted on Friday, June 13th, 2008 at 4:09 am and is filed under Azerbaijan, China, Gazprom, Iran, Kazakhstan, Russia, State Oil Company of Azerbaijan (SOCAR), Turkmenistan.  You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.  Both comments and pings are currently closed. 

Comments are closed.

Wildcats & Black Sheep is a personal interest blog dedicated to the identification and evaluation of maverick investment opportunities arising in frontier - and, what some may consider to be, “rogue” or “black sheep” - markets around the world.

Focusing primarily on The New Seven Sisters - the largely state owned petroleum companies from the emerging world that have become key players in the oil & gas industry as identified by Carola Hoyos, Chief Energy Correspondent for The Financial Times - but spanning other nascent opportunities around the globe that may hold potential in the years ahead, Wildcats & Black Sheep is a place for the adventurous to contemplate & evaluate the emerging markets of tomorrow.