China & Kyrgyzstan: Closer (But Unbalanced) Ties

From The Asia Times, an interesting examination of China’s efforts to steadily strengthening political and economic ties with small, landlocked Kyrgyzstan, with one eye on the sizeable energy reserves of its neighbors to the north and west. As the article notes, this integration results in Kyrgyzstan’s dependence on Chinese income and infrastructure growing deeper by the day:

“…At the high-altitude Irkeshtam border crossing a convoy of shiny Chinese rigs waits to cross into Kyrgyzstan. Facing the deserted vehicles, a snaking line-up of battered Kamaz trucks with Kyrgyz plates sits patiently, returning to China to load up with more cheap cellphones, TV sets and plastic kitchenware.

Here, even at this remote trade conduit between Xinjiang and Central Asia, the Chinese economic juggernaut is dominating the dynamics of trade.

Chinese and Kyrgyz vehicles alike are tangible reminders of the huge imbalance that exists between these two countries: in 2006 the value of Chinese exports flowing into Kyrgyzstan was 150 times greater than the flow in the opposite direction

Looking to fill the vacuum created when the Russians returned home from the five former Soviet Central Asian republics of Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan, Tajikistan and Turkmenistan, and the roubles dried up, China is now making moves to become the new Central Asian superpower. It is constructing roads, factories, power plants and pipelines and filling supermarket shelves with cut-price consumer goods bought with low-interest loans from Chinese banks.

…The growing influx of Chinese products into Kyrgyzstan has been accompanied by a similar inflow of Chinese citizens. Over the past 15 years Kyrgyzstan’s Chinese population has swelled from zero to around 100,000 in a total population of a little more than 5 million. These immigrants marry locals, obtain Kyrgyz citizenship, ramp up their business interests, and buy apartments. Current plans to make the yuan fully convertible in Kyrgyzstan will only serve to accelerate the flow of both Chinese currency and people.

 One business analyst in Kyrgyzstan’s second city of Osh, who wished to remain anonymous, commented, “It’s obvious this country is fast becoming another Chinese satellite. Trade with China now accounts for almost 80% of Kyrgyz foreign turnover. The European Union and Russia seem to have no unified policy on Kyrgyzstan. In the end the Chinese will become so strong that they will directly influence government policy, and that will alter the foreign political orientation of Kyrgyzstan.”

…Kyrgyzstan is now paying for the price for not bending fully to Beijing’s will. Bishkek’s reluctance to close the Manas Base has been cited as a major factor in China’s refusal to include Kyrgyzstan in a gas pipeline set to run from Turkmenistan to Xinjiang and beyond. Although the most direct route from Turkmenistan to China does pass through Kyrgyzstan, and the Kyrgyz government lobbied hard for inclusion in the project, Beijing’s move was interpreted by some as a warning to Kyrgyz leaders not to get too close to the US.

Indeed, despite China’s ascendancy, Beijing isn’t getting everything its own way in Kyrgyzstan. Alarmed by strengthening Chinese-Kyrgyz and Kazakh-Kyrgyz ties, Moscow has taken steps to renew its interest in the country. Former Russian president and now prime minister Vladimir Putin recently announced plans to invest up to $2 billion in the Kyrgyz economy, and Russian energy giant Gazprom is investing $300 million in a joint venture with Bishkek to explore for new fuel reserves and build pipeline infrastructure. Only 7% of Kyrgyzstan’s land is available for agriculture and it has relatively limited hydrocarbon resources.

Preparatory work has been announced on a China-Kyrgyzstan-Uzbekistan railway, which will start in Kashgar, in the far west of China’s Xinjiang autonomous region, while China and Uzbekistan have announced their intention to accelerate construction of transit roads through Kyrgyzstan to facilitate growing regional trade. China has also helped to construct a road that links northern and southern Kyrgyzstan.

Many analysts see power generation as another area where Kyrgyzstan may be able to generate much-needed income. Although a China-Kyrgyzstan partnership formed in 2004 promised $2 billion from China for construction of two hydroelectric sites on the Naryn River, Kyrgyzstan’s “Tulip Revolution” in 2005, which saw the overthrow of president Askar Akayev, seems to have effectively scuppered the deal. However, the apparent recent willingness of Bishkek to privatize all national assets is almost guaranteed to bring about renewed Chinese investment in Kyrgyzstan’s energy sector.

…As the Chinese economy continues to grow, accompanied by spiraling energy and raw material demands, so the strategic importance of Kyrgyzstan to Beijing will undoubtedly increase. Kazakhstan and Russia, both currently awash with fossil-fuel dollars, are looking for foreign investment opportunities, and the US needs to retain its crucial foothold in Kyrgyzstan for Afghan operations.”

This entry was posted on Friday, August 1st, 2008 at 10:45 am and is filed under China, Kyrgyzstan.  You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.  Both comments and pings are currently closed. 

Comments are closed.

Wildcats & Black Sheep is a personal interest blog dedicated to the identification and evaluation of maverick investment opportunities arising in frontier - and, what some may consider to be, “rogue” or “black sheep” - markets around the world.

Focusing primarily on The New Seven Sisters - the largely state owned petroleum companies from the emerging world that have become key players in the oil & gas industry as identified by Carola Hoyos, Chief Energy Correspondent for The Financial Times - but spanning other nascent opportunities around the globe that may hold potential in the years ahead, Wildcats & Black Sheep is a place for the adventurous to contemplate & evaluate the emerging markets of tomorrow.