Laos: Approaching WTO Membership

Via Emerging Frontiers blog, a look at Laos’ efforts to join the WTO:

After almost a decade of major economic transformation, the Lao People’s Democratic Republic is on the brink of World Trade Organization (WTO) membership. The small country’s Herculean effort to join the exclusive trade club is a reminder to the 10 other least-developed countries (LDCs) now seeking membership of the cumbersome process involved.

“LDCs think it is easy to accede to the WTO, like becoming a United Nations member, but it is not,” Nicolas Imboden, director of the Geneva-based Ideas Centre, told IPS. The non-governmental organization has been counselling Lao PDR, whose accession will be completed in October, for 14 years. It is now starting to assist Liberia and Comoros, two other least-developed countries on a waiting list that also includes Afghanistan, Bhutan, Equatorial Guinea, Ethiopia, Sao Tome, Sudan, Vanuatu and Yemen.

“They have to adopt the rules of the WTO and this is a huge task for most of them,” said Imboden. “They must undertake reforms, completely revise their legal systems and establish rules that apply to all foreign investors and importers, without discrimination.”

Laos could join the WTO by the end of the year, the chairperson Yi Xiaozhun, China’s ambassador, told the working party of delegations negotiating the membership bid, said in March. Nam Viyaketh, Laos’ Industry and Commerce Minister, said this was an ambitious but realistic target.

Imboden said many LDCs justify clamoring for membership on the grounds that it will open up new markets, a motive he argued is “flawed”, since LDCs already have good trade relations with most countries.

Rather, the “benefits” of membership are mainly domestic: aligning national economic policies with the WTO regime sets up the basis for improved economic efficiency and attracts companies eager to invest in these countries, not because of their market size but to export to the neighboring region.

“Reforms related to WTO accession require a change of attitude, not only a change of law,” Khemmani Pholsena, vice-minister of industry and commerce for Lao PDR, told IPS. “Lao PDR has reviewed and enacted some 25 trade-related laws and 50 other pieces of legislation since 2000. And I believe that these reforms will strengthen the rule of law, thereby cutting down on undue privileges and possibilities of corruption.”

Laos is still a communist country and transforming its state-run economy into a free market system is a huge task, particularly when a part of the administration wants to open up the economy and some party members don’t.

For example, before the accession process began, exporters had to deposit their money in Laotian banks and convert it into the local currency, while importers had to pay for a special license. If the government felt a particular import was undercutting state-owned enterprises, it simply did not issue the license.

“I remember having seen a whole store of watches at the central market in Vientiane,” Imboden said. “Importing watches was forbidden, but they were coming in illegally and the government would not acknowledge that it was unable to control the licenses. Now all this [illegal licensing] is abolished.”

From the experience of other recently acceded members, such as Cape Verde and Tonga, contentious issues for Laos at this stage may include trading rights, customs valuation, and intellectual property, said Pholsena.

Intellectual property has not hitherto been protected in Laos, so the country has had to build up a national institution and set up laws on patents and patenting rights.

“In 2003, there were few lawyers in the country and nearly half of them were working on intellectual property,” Imboden said. “This is not in line with Laos’ priorities. The WTO asks LDCs to adopt provisions on intellectual property that may be necessary and useful, but [they are] not needed at this stage of development and take up too many resources.”

Services liberalization may also be a challenge, since acceding countries have to liberalize more aggressively than others. “Recently acceded countries have to pay a higher price for WTO entry,” Pholsena said.

For example, “Out of a total of 160 services sub-sectors, Cambodia committed to 110, in contrast to 24 sub-sectors made by existing LDC members. Lao PDR is facing pressure to liberalize at a similar level.”

“We are aware that there will be both winners and losers as a result of these reforms and the government has to do its utmost to help the latter overcome the negative effects and transform challenges into opportunities,” Pholsena said.

She believes sectors like tourism, agro-business and natural resource-intensive industries are to Laos’ comparative advantage and will prosper.

Imboden, too, is positive. He doesn’t see many risks for Laotian industry. Competition from the other nine members of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations, with which Laos has a free trade agreement, already exists; and competition from the rest of the world is going to be limited since Laos doesn’t have big industries or inefficient state-owned enterprises, like China did.

In agriculture, he said, the accession process has already had positive effects. In flat lands, exports have increased. Laos cultivates coffee that is processed locally and exported with a good value added. And the majority of people who live on small plots and produce mainly sticky rice will face little competition from abroad.

A big chunk of the accession process is represented by the market access negotiations that are held bilaterally. Each WTO member asks the acceding country to reduce tariffs on certain items by a given percentage. Most of them don’t put excessive demands on LDCs, but some do.

Ukraine, for example, put a lot of pressure on Laos at the end of the accession process, like it did with Montenegro, blocking the accession of this small European country for a year. It asked Vientiane to reduce a substantial number of tariff lines below the applied rate, which had never before been demanded of an LDC.

“We told Laos not to give up and the other countries tried to convince Ukraine [the last country with which Laos has to resolve bilateral issues] to be less demanding, particularly after the last WTO ministerial conference, where the decision was taken to ease the accession of LDCs.”

Laos also had very difficult negotiations with the United States, but Washington has relaxed some of its requirements.

This entry was posted on Friday, May 4th, 2012 at 2:58 pm and is filed under Uncategorized.  You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.  Both comments and pings are currently closed. 

Comments are closed.

Wildcats & Black Sheep is a personal interest blog dedicated to the identification and evaluation of maverick investment opportunities arising in frontier - and, what some may consider to be, “rogue” or “black sheep” - markets around the world.

Focusing primarily on The New Seven Sisters - the largely state owned petroleum companies from the emerging world that have become key players in the oil & gas industry as identified by Carola Hoyos, Chief Energy Correspondent for The Financial Times - but spanning other nascent opportunities around the globe that may hold potential in the years ahead, Wildcats & Black Sheep is a place for the adventurous to contemplate & evaluate the emerging markets of tomorrow.